Leveling #concrete is a common practice to address uneven surfaces, whether it's a sidewalk, driveway, patio or indoor flooring. Two popular methods for achieving this are polyurethane foam injection and #mudjacking (also known as slab jacking). Let's compare the two techniques in terms of their processes, materials, benefits, and potential drawbacks.
Polyurethane Foam Injection:
Process:
Small holes are drilled into the affected concrete slab. These holes are typically 3/8 of an inch to 5/8". Once patched the holes blend right in.
A two-part polyurethane foam is injected into the holes under high pressure, expanding and filling voids beneath the slab.
As the foam expands, it begins lifting and stabilizing the concrete.
Materials:
Polyurethane foam is lightweight and has a high compressive strength. It has the ability to lift entire structures sitting atop the concrete surface.
It expands about 30X helping it to to fill voids and can be controlled more precisely than traditional mud.
Benefits:
Quick curing time: Polyurethane foam sets and cures rapidly, allowing for faster completion. The concrete is available to use the same day.
Lightweight: The foam is less dense than traditional materials, 1/50th the weight of mud and greatly reduces the burden on the underlying soil.
Waterproof: Polyurethane is resistant to water, preventing future erosion and has the ability to set up in standing water to displace the unwanted water as it fills the void.
Best for void filling: Because it starts as a liquid, it can flow into even the smallest of voids and compact any loose soils that may exist under the slab.
Drawbacks:
Cost: Polyurethane foam injection can be a little more expensive than mudjacking as the material and equipment used is fairly expensive. However, it does requires less labor and time to complete the work so price may not be too different.
Mudjacking (Slab Jacking):
Process:
Holes are drilled into the concrete slab. These holes are typically 1.5 inches in diameter.
A slurry mixture (commonly composed of water, soil, cement, and additives) is pumped into the holes, raising the slab as it fills underneath.
The holes are patched, and the surface is leveled.
Materials:
Mudjacking uses a heavier mud based material compared to polyurethane foam.
Benefits:
Cost-effective: Mudjacking can be more budget-friendly than polyurethane foam injection.
Immediate results: Because the concrete lifts as you pump vs. a delayed reaction time, there is less risk of over lifting the concrete.
Drawbacks:
Slower curing time: Mudjacking may take longer to set and cure compared to polyurethane foam. Concrete slabs can be unusable for mutiple days following the work.
Heavier material: The slurry used in mudjacking is denser, which can exert more pressure on the underlying soil.
Messy procedure: can leave mud all over and must be washed off afterwards.
Warranty: Typically only lasts a few years and can eventually wash out as did the original base.
Choosing the Right Method:
Weight Consideration: Polyurethane foam is lighter, making it suitable for situations where a lighter material is preferred.
Speed of Completion: If time is a crucial factor, polyurethane foam injection may be preferable due to its quicker curing time.
Budget Constraints: Mudjacking is often more cost-effective, making it a practical choice for those with budget limitations.
Product Warranty: Because the polyurethane foam lasts indefinitely and cannot be broken down, the warranties offered are often longer than mudjacking.
Both polyurethane foam injection and mudjacking have their merits, and the choice between them depends on factors such as the specific project requirements, budget considerations, and the desired speed of completion. Consulting with a professional contractor can help determine the most suitable method for a given concrete leveling project.
Comments